Tuesday, 17 November 2015

EDU 104.11: UNDERSTANDING THE DISCIPLINE OF ENGLISH EDUCATION


PRESENT STATUS OF ENGLISH IN INDIA

English occupies an important place in educational system and life our country. Before independence English occupied a privileged place in India. It was the language of administration, a compulsory subject at school and college and a medium of instruction for some subjects at the school and for all subjects at the university level. It opened the doors of employment and a person who did not know English was not considered educated in the true sense of the word. Knowledge of English was a must to climb the social ladder.
After Independence there was rethinking on the place of English. The constitution of India adopted in 1950 gave a lease of 15 years to English as the official language of the country. The union government took upon itself the promotion and the development of Hindi as the medium of expression during the period of 15 years. Later on, however it was realized that Hindi could not replace English by this deadline as it was not understood by the people in the south of the country. There was considerable opposition to Hindi from the south and as a result, the parliament passed in 1963 a Bill declaring English as the Associate Official Language of India till an indefinite period.
English is the language that continues to dominate the national scene. It is taught compulsorily in most of the states in the country although the class from which its teaching is started differs from state to state. In the Union Territory of Chandigarh, for example, the teaching of English is started from the third class. In Punjab and Haryana, its study is commenced from the 6th class, but in Gujarat the teaching of English is delayed up to the 8th class so far as the government schools are concerned.
As a medium of instruction at the school stage, it is now followed only in public schools. Most of the universities in the country have in addition to English. Switched over to regional languages as the medium of instruction at the college level. Some universities, for example, in Uttar Pradesh, conduct even post graduate studies in the regional language i.e., Hindi.
English exercises a great influence on the educated classes of the country. It continues to be the medium of instruction in technical, medical, law and other institutions. It is the language of communication between the Union Government and state Governments. It is the language most used in parliament and State Legislatures. It is the language of the high courts and the Supreme Court.
The English press in the country is very powerful and enjoys not only more circulation but also better influence than the vernacular press. The number of creative writers in English is increasing gradually.
English has been rightly described as the language of opportunity. Knowledge of English is a successful passport for employment. Above all English is the means of Interstate communication. Persons from different states converse in English.
The National policy on education adopted by the Government of India in 1968 stressed the importance of the study of English in these words: “Special emphasis needs to be laid on the study of English and other international languages. World knowledge is growing at a tremendous pace, especially in science and technology”. India must not only keep us this growth, but also make her own significant contribution to it. For this purpose, study of English deserves to be specially strengthened.
Prof. Ghosh and others have summed up the present state of English in India in these words, “The fact is that in India English is something more than a foreign language and something less than a second language. It has many more users, and many more uses, than a foreign language has. At the same time, the predominant role which English had in many areas of communication is gradually being taken over by other languages.

AS MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION

In recent years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the medium of instruction at the higher level. So far as medium of instruction at the school age is concerned, there is no dispute. All are agreed that the mother tongue should be the medium at this stage. But opinion is divided regarding the medium of instruction at the university level. Whereas some educationalist and politicians press the claims of the mother tongue, there are others who favor the retention of English as the medium of instruction. The recommendations of the Kothari Commission in this regard are worth quoting: “Mother tongue has a pre-eminent as the medium of instruction at the school and college stages. Moreover, the medium of instruction at the school and higher education should generally be the same. The regional language should, therefore, be adopted as the medium of instruction at the higher stage”.
Calling upon the University Grants Commission and the universities to work out a program for the adoption of this recommendation, the commission said that change over should be completed within 10 years. It desired that the universities should produce books and literature, particularly scientific and technical, in regional languages.
Regarding all India Institutions, the commission said that they should continue to use English as the medium of instruction. The eventual adoption of Hindi, should however be considered in due course, subject to certain safeguards.
Some educationalists are opposed to a changeover will adversely affect the mobility of students and teachers from one university to the other. They are afraid that such a step might result in the deterioration of educational standards and lead to the Balkanization of the country. But by and large opinion in the country is in favor of replacing English by regional languages as media of instruction.
The National policy on Education 1968 observed, “The regional languages are already in use as media of education at the primary and secondary stage. The National Policy on Education 1968 also emphasized the adoption of regional languages as the media of instruction at the university stage.
The views of Gandhi and Tagore against retaining English as the medium of instruction are well known Gandhi says, “In my opinion this is not a question to be decided by academicians. They cannot decide through what language the boys and girls of a place to be educated. That question is already decided for them in every free country”. The obvious choice for the medium of instruction is the regional language.
It is wrong to believe that adoptions of regional languages will disintegrate the country. We are not discarding English altogether. Even the Kothari Commission which recommended this change desired that university graduates should be well conversant with English. Thus English will continue to be a means of interstate communication till Hindi replaces etc.
It is interesting to note that some state governments and universities, in their anxiety and haste to switch over to regional languages as the medium of instruction adopted this measure without even offering English to the students as an alternative medium. This led to widespread resentment among the students and their parents, who sought legal remedies. It happened in the case of Tamil Nadu and the Punjab Universities. In both cases, the court allowed the students the freedom to choose their medium of instruction and examination.
In all countries of the world there is a trend to teach foreign languages. As educated Indians already know English, which is an international language, it is convenient and more useful for a pupil to read English. Besides, knowledge of English will help a person in interstate communication. It may also help in getting a job in another state.

ASSOCIATE OFFICIAL LANGUAGE

After Independence there was a lot of national thinking over the choice of an official language for our country. Mahatma Gandhi proposed Hindi to be our national language. He raised the argument that Hindi has been an indigenous language, the single language, knowledge for the major section of the people. That is around 30 percentage of population and easily accessible to known Hindi speaking people. He was also against educating our people in English because it would deprive them of their national pride and it would result in slavish behavior. But Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad, C. Rajagopalachari and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru were anxious about the adverse consequences of setting our face against English.
The official language problem became intense in 1950, the year of commencement of our constitution. Articles 343 to 351 of part XVII of the constitution deal with the issue of official language. Clause 2 of Article 343 states: “For a period of 15 years from the commencement of the constitution, the English language shall continue to be used for all purposes of the union for it was being used before such commencement”. The speculation that Hindi would develop to substitute English did not manifest in reality. Protests from some non-Hindi speaking states remarkably Madras and West Bengal resulted in a setback to the development of Hindi. As provided for in the constitution, the official languages commission was appointed in 1955. The commission strongly recommended the continuation of English. The members of commission had no consensus over the issue on official language being switches over to Hindi. Later in 1966 the Kothari Commission also resisted the idea saying that the adoption of Hindi as a common medium of education was not possible for some years to come. The Central Advisory Board of Education and the chief ministers’ conference 1961 devised the Three Language Formula for schools in which English had an important place.
Though in 1950, there was speculation about developing Hindi during the 15 years to come, there were no signs of it being realized. And there was opposition from non-Hindi speaking states. Therefore the parliament, by an Act (1965) decided to accord English, the status of Associate Official Language of India for an indefinite period. This position continues still and it will be too difficult to relegate the status of English as Associate Official Language.

NCF AND KCF REPORTS ON ENGLISH LANGUAGE

Education is an important factor both in the day to day development of the child and in contributing to the personal, social, cultural and economic fulfillment of the future adult. The state of Kerala today occupies an inevitable position in terms of several indicators of social and human development. It is the spread of general education that has made this possible. Kerala’s performance in the field of general education has been so impressive that it could receive the distinctive acclamation as the ‘Kerala Model’.

SIGNIFICANCE OF CURRICULUM REVISION

Changes occur every minute in all fields of life. The latest findings and practical experiences in pedagogy and educational psychology have enabled the development of learning materials and the transaction of learning experiences in a better way. These are aimed at the overall improvement of learners. “It must be ensured that children who have different physical, psychological and cognitive abilities can learn and achieve success at school. To overcome the limitations that develop from differences in gender, caste, language and physical disabilities, policies and projects will not alone serve and design suitable teaching methods and learning objectives right from childhood”. (NCF 2005, page 27)
Thus, as pointed out by NCF, the perspective should be to adopt minute as well as scientific strategies to provide the desired learning outcome to children from all sections of society. This can be achieved only if curriculum revisions are carried out periodically and the system is always kept active. The existing curriculum is revised based on this vision by imbibing the experiences findings and research of those who constantly intervene in the field of education. The scientific approach of proceeding from what is good to what is better is adopted here.

RELEVANCE OF KERALA CURRICULUM 2013

Several innovative ideas were presented in the field of education over the years. With the implementation of the Right to Education Act in the year 2009, quality education has eventually become the right of the child. The curriculum for schools has to be raised to an international educational standard to implement such a right based comprehensive school development vision. The expert committee constituted by the government for curriculum revision stressed the necessity of revising the curriculum with time. Besides, during curriculum revision, it is essential to consider the postulates concerning curriculum and assessment in the Right to Education.

CHARACTERISTICS

·         Learner centered, process oriented, activity based and value oriented
·         Emphasis is on the learning outcomes that a learner imbibes at the cognitive, social and emotional levels.
·         Focuses on the skills to be attained by the learners in values and attitudes
·         Based on the philosophy of constructivism.
·         Teachers enjoy the freedom to choose and employ logical and varied learning strategies for the transaction of curriculum.
·         Flexible to implement various teaching-learning strategies recognizing the learning outcomes, nature of the content and the different levels of the learners. Discovery learning concept attainment model, inductive method, metacognition, co-operative learning, collaborative learning, reflective learning and giving opportunities to individuals and group learning etc. are taken into consideration.
·         Ensures free and universal education to all learners.
·         Comprehensive and takes into consideration the various stages from the pre-primary level to the secondary level.
·         Used as an effective tool for the transaction of various subjects.
·         Designs innovative learning strategies as well as assessment activities for children with special educational needs.
·         Ensures a continuous and comprehensive evaluation focused on learning outcomes.
·         Stresses, health and physical education, art education and work education.

CURRICULUM APPROACH

New thoughts in educational psychology and philosophy have been incorporated while developing the new curriculum. The idea of constructivism put forth by the NCF 2005 serves as a basis for the Kerala school curriculum 2013 too. Constructivism that looks upon learning as an active mental process that provides for construction of knowledge.
Every child is born with the natural ability to learn from the surroundings through sense organs. Through formal education the learner gains the possibilities to view the world from a fresh perspective and to understand, mingle with and access it. The features of the curriculum-transaction approach:
·         Activity based.
·         Process related.
·         Ensuring learning.
·         Sufficient to attain learning outcomes.
·         Environment friendly.
·         Considers area of development.
·         Suitable for the nature of the learner.
·         Integrates teaching and evaluation.

GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF LEARNING ENGLISH-AN EXCERPT FROM NCF 2000 AND 2005

Language education must aim at encouraging independent thinking, free and effective expression of opinions and logical interpretation of the present and past events. It must motivate learners to say things their way, nurture their natural creativity and imagination and thus make them realize their identity.
The changed perspective:
·         The national curriculum framework – 2005
·         The baseline study conducted by the Focus Group on English for the revision of state curriculum.
THE FINDINGS OF THE STUDY ARE:
·         The study on the materials reveals that majority of the materials used in the field belong to the behaviorist paradigm. The insights derived from current understandings on language and language acquisition is not reflected in them. They do not treat language as discourses but focus on fragments of language. Though a variety of discourses are introduced, the treatment is seen invariably at the sentence level or word level.
·         The study on the prevailing classroom processes reveals that most teachers still take resource to mother tongue translation. The classrooms continue to be teacher dominated. Discourse input and output are by and large neglected.
·         Learners at all levels seem to enjoy learning English. The constructivist even in evaluation tools in classes 8,9 and 10 has made the learning of English more enjoyable through the materials used in these classes continue to be the behaviorist paradigm.
·         The majority of the parents in Kerala are in favor of introducing English in class 1 itself. Parents welcome learner-friendly materials and evaluation in English. There is a demand for supplementary reading materials too.

OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT STATUS

There have been positive changes in the profile of the English classrooms in Kerala since the introduction of the revised curriculum and textbooks in 2007, based on the Kerala curriculum framework. The confidence level of learners in using English has gone up considerably. The Children across the state have started producing their own writing in English in the form of stories, poems and other language discourses. By and large the general proficiency of teachers has also improved. However, a large number of learners are found struggling to use English for real life purposes, even after a faulty long period of language learning.
It has been noticed that the linguist and conceptual growth which the learners should attain in constructing language discourses across different stages is not discernible, as envisioned. English requires intensive focus in the process of its teaching and learning. Learners should get optimum meaningful exposure to English.
The existing approach treats language at the discourse level, which means that language is not viewed as a set of disconnected sentences but as a set of linguistic discourses such as stories, songs, conversations, narratives, slogans etc. but most of the teachers, especially at the primary level, find it a difficult to evaluate the quality of language produced by their learners. The editing process by which the learners need to be scaffold to refine their language is proved to be another challenge for most of the teachers. This results in the learners not getting the expected quality of language and learning outcomes.
There is a slot for self-assessment questions based on the most important features of the task at hand. The mechanical repetition of constructing language discourses without taking care of the quality of languages, which should be reflected in them, has adversely affected the organic and vibrant nature of language learning experience.
A learner who undergoes a particular curriculum process or tasks in textbooks needs to be aware of the conventions of speaking and writing a language. Knowledge about language elements will work as a conscious monitor once the acquisition stage is completed. Teachers have to ensure that learners acquire the concepts, skills and attitudes envisioned for a particular level. The learning outcomes may be stated clearly and care should be taken to ensure that learners achieve these outcomes before they proceed to the next level.

NATIONAL CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK 2005

The National Curriculum Framework 2005 is a country wide agenda for activated school education formulated by NCERT in 2005. Its purpose is to evolve a national system of education capable of responding to India’s diversity of geological and cultural milieus while ensuring a common core of values along with academic components. It’s a means of modernizing the system of education.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

·       Connecting knowledge to life outside the school.
·       Ensuring that learning is shifted away from rote methods.
·       Enriching the curriculum to provide for overall development of children rather than remain textbook center.
·         Making examinations more flexible and integrated into classroom life.
·     Nurturing an over-riding identity by caring concerns within the democratic policy of the country.

NEW CONCERNS OF THE FRAMEWORK

·         Building a cohesive society based on pillars of relevance, equality and excellence.
·         Integrating indigenous knowledge and recognizing India’s contribution to the world civilizations.
·     Inculcating and nurturing a sense of pride in being an Indian, patriotism and nationalism tempered with the spirit of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam.
·         Universalizing elementary education and linking education with life skills.
·         Value development at all stages of school education.
·         Meeting the challenges of information and communication technology and globalization.
·         Reducing the curriculum load.
·         Using culture specific pedagogy.
·         Viewing the child as a constructor of knowledge.
·         Recognizing the interface between cognition, emotion and action.
·         Empowering teachers for curriculum development and implementation.
·         Co-ordinated decentralization of the process of curriculum development.

SAILENT FEARURES OF NCF-2005

·         The NCF encompasses all the stages of school education from the pre-primary to the higher secondary.
·         It reaffirms faith in the constitutional visions of India as a secular egalitarian and pluralistic society founded on values of social justice and equality.
·         It addresses the challenges of quality in a system that seeks to reach every child the exclusive triangle of equality, quality and quantity.
·         It takes the following aims of education into account:
a)      To build a commitment to democratic values of equality, justice, freedom, secularism and respect for human dignity and rights.
b)      Fostering independence of thought and action.
c)      Sensitivity to others well-being and feelings.
d)     Learning to learn and unlearn.
e)      Ability to work for developing a social temper.
f)       Inculcate aesthetic appreciation.
·         It focuses on the primary of the learner.
·         It recognizes the need for developing and enabling a non-threatening environment for learning.
·         The framework highlights the value of interaction with the environment, nature, things and people in enhancing learning.
·         It recommends significant changes in Language, Maths, Natural Science and Social Sciences with a view of reducing stress and making education more relevant to the present day and future needs of children.
·         It wants to make environment education as a part of every subject.
·         It recommends that gender, justice, sensitivity to tribal and Dalit issues and minority sensibilities should inform all sectors of social sciences.
·         NCF revisits traditional notions of discipline and discusses the need for providing space for parents and community.
·         The framework addresses the need for plurality of material, as also the need for teacher autonomy and professional independence.
·         It also discusses curriculum sites and learning resources, including texts and books, libraries, education technology, tools and laboratories etc.

NCF’S VISION ON LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE

Ø  In teaching-learning activities, primary will be given to learner’s experiences, their voices and their active participation.
Ø  Children will learn only in an atmosphere where they feel they are valued.
Ø  In learning context, the children need to feel that each one of them, their homes, communities, languages and cultures are valuable as resources for experience to be analyzed and enquired into a school.
Ø  Since children learn in a variety of ways through experience, making and doing things, experimentation, reading, discussion, asking, listening, thinking and learning and expressing oneself in speech, movement or writing – both individually and with others, they require opportunities of all these kinds in the course of their development.
Ø  Teaching should be oriented towards the construction of knowledge by the learners. So schools must provide opportunities to question, enquire debate, reflect and arrive at concepts or create new ideas.
Ø  Learning takes places through interactions with the environment around, nature, things and people both through actions and through language. So arrange for interaction with teachers with peers, as well as with others.
Ø  The quality of the learning task influences its learnability and its value for the learner. So design the learning task in such a way that it encourages to seek out knowledge from sites other than textbook.
Ø  Teaching should result in the developing of critical awareness in the learner. So facilitate collective decision making through open discussion and by encouraging and recognizing multiple views.
Ø  Learning should be contextualized. Make the boundary between the school and its natural and social environment porous.
Ø  Make the experiences of the socio-cultural world a part of the curriculum.

RECOMMENDATIONS OF NCF

Some of the major recommendations made by the NCF 2005 for the qualitative improvement at the different stages of school education are as follows:
Ø  Ensuring availability of pre-school education to all children in the country and prohibiting formal teaching and testing of different subjects at this level.
Ø  Integration of environmental education with languages, mathematics and other activities in the first two years of the primary stage.
Ø  Integration of art education, health and physical education and work education into the ‘Art of Healthy and Productive Living’ at the primary stage.
Ø  Education about religious and inherent values of all religious to be imparted at all the stages of school education.
Ø  Integration of science and technology up to the secondary stage.
Ø  Bringing mathematics closer to life and setting up of mathematics corner in the existing science laboratory for practical mathematics up to secondary stage.
Ø  Sticking to the basic policy of three languages formula and emphasizing the teaching of Hindi as the official language of India and Sanskrit as the language of traditional wisdom and culture of the country.
Ø  Emphasizing the implementations of semestrisation at the secondary and higher secondary stages.
Ø  Provision for wide flexibility and freedom in the choice of subjects among the courses to be offered at the higher secondary stage.
Ø  Providing a strong vocational stream for enhancing employability and entrepreneurship at the higher secondary stage.
Ø  Evolving a humane, learner friendly, error-free responsive and transparent evaluation system.
Ø  Reducing the predominance of external examination and removal of the pass and fail categories up to class.
Ø  Use of different methods of grading scholastic and co-scholastic areas of learning.
Ø  Use of alternative evaluation procedures for learners with special needs.

REFERENCES

·         Techniques of Teaching English- A.L.Kohli, Dhanpat Rai and Sons.
·         Teaching of English- P.P Khatri, Tandon publications Ludhiana.
·   English language education- Dr.K.Sivarajan, T.V Ramakrishnan, K.Mridula, Calicut University, central co-operative stores.
·         English handbook, Std ix, Govt.of Kerala, Department of education 2010.
·         English handbook, Std viii, Govt.of Kerala, Department of education 2013.
·         Philosophical and sociological bases of education, Dr. N K Arjunan, Yuga publications.
·         http://www.ncert.nic.in/rightside/link/pdf/framework/english/nf2005.pdf.




No comments:

Post a Comment